Hi airsound,
Thank you for your post. Can you tell us how it was established that the pilot was both expert and experienced and which criteria were used?
I wasn’t present and haven’t read the proceedings (or very much of the open press coverage tbh) but there seems to be the ‘expert opinion’ that something must have been wrong because the pilot’s perceived status ruled out other explanations. Just wondering how that status was established and tested.
Thanks in advance for any light shed.