Originally Posted by
Legalapproach
Treble one, as one of AH's defence barristers (and the defence barrister in the Hoyle criminal case) I'm not sure I ought to give away how the prosecution should do it!!
Acknowledging that you have no duty to prove anything, I’d still have thought that you’d welcome the opportunity to defend your client successfully against a complete and well-put case!
Is there a procedural barrier to a prosecution using an AAIB report as a handrail and asking the appropriate questions of the appropriate witnesses to bring out the same evidence in admissible fashion?