Originally Posted by
Capt Kremmen
It might be that the re-occurrence of an event of a similar nature to that being discussed, would be lessened if Historic Aircraft, already a finite source, would of necessity be confined to a more sedate display.
I'm second to none in my liking for, and appreciation of, displays of energetic aerobatics flown with panache but, pulling high G loads does not bode well for the extended lifespan of Historic Aircraft airframes.
The public, by and large, attend air displays with a camera and are thrilled and excited by the appearance of their favourite aircraft. Photo opportunities of Historic Aircraft making sedate passes, wing overs, gentle turns are surely all that is required. Pilots and airframes alike could benefit from more restrained displays, thus providing some additional element of safety to the routine.
Seeing the aircraft in restrained flight is almost as good as seeing it demonstrated exuberantly.
Keep the perspective. Privately owned and maintained aircraft can be used within their capabilities according to the regulations. The wear and tear is up to the owners. "Sedate" displays are not a panacea for accidents. However, that is not to say that "the regulations" were satisfactory and, no amount of over-regulation will ever stop all accidents.
One big point that may colour the future of displays is, the apparent establishment that a CI may occur at anytime and absolve blameworthiness.
OAP