PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Atlas Air 767 down/Texas
View Single Post
Old 6th Mar 2019, 16:48
  #317 (permalink)  
SteinarN
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Norway
Age: 57
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FCeng84
Response of the stabilizer to a failure of the jack screw or its nut and braking system would be greatly influenced by the position of the attached elevators. The horizontal tail normally carries as downward load (less so at aft CG, more so at forward CG). With the stabilizer hinge line forward of its center of pressure, the load on the jack screw is usually in the direction associated with rotating the stabilizer in the leading edge up (i.e., airplane nose down) direction. If the linkage controlling stabilizer position were to let loose I would expect the stabilizer to rotate in that direction causing the airplane to pitch nose down. In response (either by way of the autopilot or the crew) the elevator would be commanded in the airplane nose up direction (elevator surface trailing edge up) that would put further moment on the stabilizer to drive it in the airplane nose down direction.

We also need to remember that the lift generated by the tail is only a small portion of the total lift of the airplane. For the overall airplane to enter an essentially ballistic free-fall the wing angle of attack would have to decrease to that for zero lift. A horizontal tail mechanism failure that allows the stabilizer to float will result in nose down pitching moment that would tend to decrease wing AOA, but it is not correct to assume that a floating stabilizer leads to the wing experiencing AOA corresponding to zero lift. It is very possible that such a failure would result in sufficient nose down pitching moment to drive the wing to a significantly negative AOA to cause negative g.
I was giving some thought to what the wings AoA would be after the stabilizer had reached zero AoA. As the aircraft should be more or less nose heavy the nose should drop down decreasing wings AoA. My thinking is that when the wings reach zero AoA then the complete aircraft is free falling (when talking about vertical movement) and the aircraft is no longer nose heavy, as there is zero G on every part of the aircraft. However there would still be some momentum left, causing the tipping down of the nose to continue past the zero AoA of the wings, and then the wings should start to produce negative lift as you speculate. When the wings produce negative lift and the nose is still heavy (as in center of mass beeing forward of wings center of lift) then the aircraft should go more nose up again. So there might be some ocillations. My thinking is then that as the vertical speed increases the aircraft must point more and more nose down in order to keep the wings at pluss/minus zero AoA.

So, I would speculate that a free floating HT where the hinge point is forward of the center of lift line will cause the aircraft to quickly reach approximately zero G and thereafter increase vertical speed at approximately 10m/s2 (1G) which would take an object from 6000 feet to the ground in 20 sec.
SteinarN is offline