It might be worth exploring the 'why' of FBW. On the newer military aircraft, FBW is pretty much a necessity due to the lack of inherent stability needed to provide great maneuverability. For a human to fly such an aircraft without the computer assistance provided by the FBW system, it would very difficult (in some cases actually impossible) and quickly exhausting to the pilot - not exactly beneficial for someone who needs to be alert and ready for combat. Plus, those military aircraft have a 'get the hell out of Dodge' lever they can use if the system malfunctions or things otherwise go south.
Commercial aircraft have moved to FBW for fundamentally different reasons. Cable flight control systems are high maintenance, require very careful design to get the control column forces right, and are non-fault tolerant. As computer systems have become cheaper and more reliable, it's actually cheaper to design a FBW system, they have multiple levels of redundancy and hence are highly fault tolerant, are easier to maintain (basically pull out the black box and put in a new one), and allow much better integration between the flight control systems and the rest of the aircraft systems (e.g. autothrottle/autothrust).. But you still want good stability to make it easier on those human pilots to handle it if things go south, - there is no 'get out of Dodge' option for either the pilots or the passengers, so you want the aircraft as easy to fly and land as possible when things aren't working right.