Dick, back on message. The questions remain mostly unanswered.
Are you struggling to articulate your ideas in any meaningful way because you don't believe you are relevant in this situation? Is it because the idea is so fanciful it falls over with every notion. Take for example, 'a number of flying schools have sold out to the Chinese': surely your advice equally now applies to them? Same horse just a different jockey. They too will lose money and ultimately become bankrupt too, won't they Dick? Is that the plan? Let some other bunny sip the poisoned chalice? Or are you ok with an operator of Chinese heritage getting smacked by the onerous CASA regime? That's definitely a question needing an answer! And what if a prospective buyer is not of Chinese heritage Dick? How does your advice manage that scenario? Sell? Don't sell?
But hang on, Chinese heritage or otherwise, won't they also train the people who may very well become the future pilots for those future politicians needing a charter flight in outback Queensland? And what then for the industry exodus? Ideas in disarray, Dick? The advice you give is hardly credible is it Dick? The slow drip feed of tiny detail thus far shows its just a thought bubble, isn't it Dick.
Given you've now made it known you don't believe you're relevant in this situation, is it now time to give this position away and discontinue the damaging industry wide broadcasts that everyone should get out? Should you be considered a credible commentator or merely one seeking to boost one's public profile?