PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Why new generators are lighter than old generators
Old 10th Feb 2019, 00:23
  #9 (permalink)  
punkalouver
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here, there, and everywhere
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by tdracer
Boeing used the same IDG on the 757, 767, and 747-400 (regardless of engine type). But the reliability of the IDG varied greatly between the installations - for example the MTBF on the 757/PW2000 was less than half that of the 757/RB211-535.
This was initially quite puzzling until someone thought to look at the typical and peak IDG oil temperatures between the various installations - turns out there was an almost linear inverse relationship between the oil temp and the IDG MTBF - the higher the oil temp, the worse the IDG reliability For reasons that I don't recall, the PW2000 IDG had by far the highest operating oil temperatures.
It was bad enough that back around year 2000 we looked at what it would take to get the IDG oil temp down around that for the Rolls installation. Unfortunately all the identified fixes would be so expensive to retrofit that it was cheaper to simply keep replacing the IDG.

BTW radken, IIRC the 787 alternators are 150 KVA each, not 250...
Interesting. I had a couple of lost generator situations on the 727. That was when the last item on the checklist(actually it was a post checklist thing we did) was to place an empty coffee cup on the flap handle....for later reminder to not select any flaps until a pack had been turned off. All so that the remaining genrators wouldn't be lost when the high electrical draw pack cooling fans started operating when flaps were extended(hope my memory is correct).

Anyways, I remember one particular generator failure was a on a flight where it had been noted earlier in cruise that the CSD oil temp was higher than the others. Can't remember if it was the In or Rise temp. 40 KVA generators if I remember correctly.
punkalouver is offline