View Single Post
Old 7th Feb 2019, 13:32
  #18 (permalink)  
Thud105
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fresno
Age: 69
Posts: 247
"The defendants argued during their 42-day trial that their actions were justified: that even if they had technically broken the law, they had a good reason for doing so."


Let's say that someone can't afford to buy their insulin (seriously, people are dying because of that over here). If they held up a bank to get money to buy insulin, would the " even if they had technically broken the law, they had a good reason for doing so" work as a defence?
Thud105 is offline