PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - More KC-46A woes....
View Single Post
Old 5th Feb 2019, 12:41
  #882 (permalink)  
KenV
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Just This Once...
ARBS reduces the maximum pitch angle available.
So Airbus's solution to reduced ground pitch angle is to reduce MTOGW, thus preserving critical field length? Interesting. But this means that anytime the MRTT is operating from long runways where critical field length is not a factor, the airplane remains weight restricted. Seems like an odd trade to me. But hey, there's a number of things about Airbus design approaches I find odd, but are perfectly acceptable in normal service.

But wait. Voyager does not have ARBS. So if ARBS is why MTOGW is reduced, why is Voyager's MTOGW reduced? Something does not add up.

Last edited by KenV; 5th Feb 2019 at 16:22.
KenV is offline