High wing hello , I wish I could answer that. As you dont know where you went wrong and only get the exam result its difficult to judge where the weaknesses are.
i thought the plotting was pretty straight forward as were the PNR , PET type questions. there was very little trig or departure , however the training seemed to concentrate highly on those areas.
I have always been 'frightened' of this subject more than any other and wonder if that fear has anything to do with it.
As i said I thought the exam seemed straight forward compared to some of the papers I had done at my school. Rest assured, i intend to be an expert before i sit this pig again.
Hi Jingster, hows it going, got many more to sit?
Have you had training with Send Clowns? Bournemouth isnt he?
Canada goose, well done on the results, funny thing, i sat the instruments paper this time thought it was harder than G-nav, yet i walked an 89% in it.makes no sense to me.
good point on the RTFQ, perhaps thats an issue to be addressed.