Originally Posted by
Asturias56
No point in rehashing all this stuff - lets just concentrate on how and when the USAF get a compliant aircraft that they're happy with
Very well. But words have meaning. What do
you mean by "compliant" and "happy". Indeed, what do you mean by "USAF"? The USAF operators and maintainers who have already received the aircarft are not just happy but ecstatic with the KC-46s they've gotten. The USAF generals who lead these men and women are reportedly very happy with the tanker. The USAF procurement officials who signed the DD250 and formally accepted the aircraft are very happy with it. Which USAF officials do
you believe are not "happy" with the delivered tankers? And in what ways do you believe the already delivered KC-46's are not "compliant." You do realize that there is a considerable difference between a "non-compliance" and a "deficiency."