PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 27th Jan 2019, 09:52
  #5368 (permalink)  
Asturias56
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,464
Received 364 Likes on 213 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
I still fail to see why the Ski Ramp deck....when the ships are large enough for standard Cat Launches.

All the Ski Ramp does is prevent standard carrier ops....that doesn't seem very smart at all.
World naval Review 2019 has a very good description of the design evolution of the QE's

basically they were originally planned to have, in the Alpha iteration, with a conventional CATOBAR system. This was turned out to be a 73000 ++ ton hi-spec ship that was un-affordable

They then went to a "Flexible design" for Cats etc but by the time they 'd gone down to Bravo (55 ,000) and (via Charlie) back up to Delta (65,000) tonnes costs were up all over and the US had decided to go to the (unproven) EMALS system - which was required a lot more conversion work (and cost) than the original CATOBAR conversion. The RN also didn't fancy developing their own CATOBAR system from scratch (god forbid they'd buy one from France - what would BAe do for profits?) so really they defaulted to what they knew - STOVL. They were lucky there was version of the F-35 available otherwise it would probably have had to have been EMALS but only one ship.
Asturias56 is offline