A NO vote should help clear out another layer of useless, self-serving managers. The only way to get this train back on the tracks is to force the owners to realise there is a serious problem, and one that is getting worse by the day. A NO vote forces that realisation. Don't be worried about "threats" from our managers (who seem to have made intimidation part of their skill set). Instead, recognise that no matter what the outcome, it at least should provide clarity as to the viability of whether there is a real career left in CX. A NO vote forces management to show their true intentions, and that helps each and every one of us to decide whether the real CX is the one we want to spend our careers with. Don't be afraid of the truth, be more afraid of allowing CX to deceive you and waste more of your career by giving them the tools to slowly boil you to death. That is what a YES vote would provide them. A NO vote is the only sensible response to such a derisory offer, and one that obviously is woefully inadequate, one-sided and dangerous. NO.
(and CK, thanks for the "threat" towards your non-existent offer of basings if we vote NO. You have shown the true cynicism inherent in all of your level and up. Dangled, illusionary carrots won't do it anymore. Pathetic)