Originally Posted by
Cpt. Underpants
Is it possible that for the first time, the GC has referred the decision to the membership to soundly vote "no" instead of the usual impasse that CX management consistently blames on an obstructive, uncooperative GC?
Of course, the proposal is awful, and no-one in their right minds would vote yes.
A NO vote is exactly what the GC wants!
The GC really isn't that smart.