Originally Posted by
Asturias56
As far as I am aware there is only a definition of "serious harm" in the Children's Act and the Defamation Acts
I'll bet the lawyers will claim it was only a "serious inconvenience" - no-one was hurt, injured, nothing was stolen or damaged etc etc
The reporting was that the Crawley couple were "detained on suspicion of disrupting services of civil aviation aerodrome to endanger or likely to endanger safety of operations or persons". Not sure what piece of legislation this is pulled from.