I think the crux of the matter is the belief Nowluke and AVMED have of
The opinion of a "specialist" is the lowest evidentiary weight in clinical decision making.
. Having worked in the medical industry and having friends and family who are in the medical profession this statement I think would be insulting. I know of two people who are considered to be in the top 10 in the world in their field, the data input to any "gold standard clinical trials" would consist partly of their work. They would be the best people to understand any nuances born out of any clinical trials that may have been conducted, rather than some statistical analyst or bureaucratic medical officer. Yet the arrogance of AVMED and Nowluke suggest that these people know nothing of the outcomes of the procedures they perform!