PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Boeing 737 Stick Shake
View Single Post
Old 1st Dec 2018, 21:44
  #4 (permalink)  
safetypee
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Thanks MFS, FCEng.
Thus as I understand this ‘commonly used’ architecture provides ‘fail safe’ stick-shaker operation at the expense of an erroneous high AoA input, which I assume is part of the high reliability requirement - AoA inputs have to be robust.
It is this rare failure case which enters the debate on MCAS, and use of AoA in other systems.
If other systems drills are predicated on the same architecture of ‘no immediate effect for stick-shake’ (low reading AoA), there may still be many other disagreement alerts and system consequences.


Last edited by safetypee; 2nd Dec 2018 at 08:59. Reason: typo
safetypee is offline