It’s tiresome, boring and detracts from someone’s attempt to improve their knowledge.
Chesty. The above quote could well apply to you too. Sarcasm is unpleasant and the lowest form of wit.
Now back to the subject of autobrake use. During the late Sixties or early 70's at a Boeing 727 Symposium held in Seattle, operators from around the world attended. When exchanging views at the symposium, evidence was presented by operators that, contrary to what Boeing had claimed that use of autobrakes would reduce wear and tear on brake units and wheels, autobrake use was causing double the brake changes and same with tyre wear.
Boeing replied by explaining the context of their recommendation. They admitted wear and tear was higher but that it was equal wear and tear so that scheduled servicing periods were more predictable. Boeing also stated that auto brake use was designed for operation where runway conditions were limited such that any delay in applying manual braking could be critical. Boeing further added that where sufficient margin of runway length was available there was no need to use autobrakes.
I doubt at the time that Boeing foresaw pilots using autobrakes as a means to make convenient taxi exit points along a runway; thus converting excess runway available into a considerably shorter landing run. Result - hotter brakes.