My role - Current operator; 2,500 hrs on type.
I have not challenged the AAIB report.
I have not said anything directly in relation to SPAO
I said "I suggest that the next time you get into a 135, switch on the Battery, switch on the Avionics, (leaving the SHED BUSS switch alone) and notice that the Rad Alt and landing lamp are powered."
I repeat, "My point being, get in your aircraft and find out what will or will not be available in the event of ..." (i.e. get to know your machine, each is different)
I am not getting drawn into any pointless discussions with someone that needlessly quotes to me the AAIB report and then goes to say ...
The rest of you post I agree with except the relight reference was in respect to the first engine failing offering a possible explanation why one of the prime pumps was selected ON.
... when the report says, "When examined by the AAIB after the accident site had been stabilised,
both the No 1
and No 2 prime pump switches were found to be in the on position." and "The engine control panel switches for the FADECs were found set to
ON and the ENG I and ENG II switches were
guarded in the FLIGHT position."
Stop your blind offering of possible explanations, it helps no one.