I’m terribly sorry but I think I must be a bit thick. I still don’t quite get your point.
I have no problem with devices which monitor flight parameters as I’m sure none of my peers would. Nobody is trying to hide anything.
The point we are discussing, very specifically, here is the underspeed rotate of a Raptor. How do you honestly expect that routine FDR monitoring would have caught this particular trend?
I understand how other trends might be caught and I fully appreciate the benefits to be had. I just really can’t get my head around how you think this trend could have been caught when nobody could honestly have guessed it was going to be an issue worth looking for in the first place.
As I said, maybe I’m being thick, but could someone please enlighten me?
BV