PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - RAF Start Talks on E-3D Replacement
View Single Post
Old 16th Nov 2018, 18:45
  #143 (permalink)  
frodo_monkey
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Here and there
Age: 41
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by melmothtw
An endorsed requirement that hasn't existed with the C-17, RC-135, P-8, E-7, Voyager? RAF must be close to having as many types it can't refuel as can.
I completely agree that Voyager *should* also have a boom a la the Aussie version, but it could be argued that the other types have sufficient internal fuel for their role (not Voyager, it doesn’t have an AAR ‘take’ facility as far as I know) but that patently isn’t the case for a FJ which is always fuel-limited.
frodo_monkey is offline