Please excuse the intrusion into the Rotary forum by a fixed wing pilot.
As a fixed wing pilot (Fast Jets) with 19 years experience I have perhaps more knowledge of helicopters than the layperson. However, I cannot claim to have anything even approaching comprehensive knowledge of the magic involved in keeping them airborne.
Clearly my thoughts are prompted by the Leicester incident and it’s possible cause.
So, my question is, which is inherently safer? A conventional tail rotor set up or the twin rotor format of the Chinook.
What dangers do Chinooks (and similar types) face that other helicopters don’t?
Why aren’t there more aircraft with twin rotors? Is it pure cost or a size and role issue?
Which would you rather fly in?
Ironically in my 19 years in the RAF I’ve never flown in a Chinook. I have flown in Puma, Merlin, Gazelle, Blackhawk, Jet Ranger and Sea King though.
Apologies for the the long winded post. I’m just curious with no axe to grind and no agenda save for a thirst for knowledge.
BV