From the
ABC article:
Originally Posted by Mr Rhodes
Mr Rhoades said passengers enjoyed "rock and roll flights" but they weren't aerobatic and before each flight passengers were asked to fill in a form if they wanted a flight which included a demonstration of a light aircraft's ability within "normal" procedures.
Someone might want to re-read the rulebook...And do we see functioning dual-controls there in contravention of CAR 155?
Originally Posted by CAR 1988
...manoeuvres intentionally performed by an aircraft involving an abrupt change in its attitude, an abnormal attitude, or an abnormal variation in speed.
Originally Posted by The FAA
For the purposes of this section, aerobatic flight means an intentional maneuver involving an abrupt change in an
aircraft's attitude, an abnormal attitude, or abnormal acceleration, not necessary for normal flight.