PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AOC or not?
Thread: AOC or not?
View Single Post
Old 6th Oct 2018, 23:17
  #49 (permalink)  
andrewr
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aroa
people try to mash 206 and 2 7 d into one rule .

Industry /flying people might but CAsA legal acrobat people dont....they can see two distinct strict liability criminal offences...
eg... re206... Photography, a commercial activity, requires an AOC and a CPL
... re 2 7 d Photography, using an aeroplane for a commercial purpose, as above.
Bang gotcha with both barrels.!!
Separate ways of dealing with the same offence... twice.
Neither CAR 206 nor CAR 2 specify an offence. They are both simply definitions, referred to elsewhere in the regulations.

Certainly, operating without an AOC when one is required is an offence. So is flying without a commercial license when one is required. I'm not sure how those could NOT be 2 separate offences.

The difference between CAR 206 and CAR 2 is this:
  • Operations listed in CAR 206 require an AOC.
  • Everything requires a commercial license, except what is listed in CAR (2) 7 d or CAR (2) 7A.
andrewr is offline