Originally Posted by
kghjfg
Ask yourself, why would TCT be attending if it was obvious it would just be a rerun of the last attempt. There must be a new plan.
You’re right. In the absence of a cunning, new plan only a glutton for punishment would pitch up hoping to get a different result to the 2016 AGM. What is different this year is that:
1. An expensive lawyer is working for TCT.
2. An expensive
PR company is working for TCT.
3. Both have been haranguing the LAA for some months now.
4. At least one LAA Board member appears to support her argument, having submitted the proposal himself on TCT’s behalf.
Now I would be very surprised if TCT is risking a second rebuff because one board member has expressed sympathy for her cause so what else has been said and done between 1, 2, 4 and the rest of the LAA board? The answer is we don’t know because the board aren’t telling the membership.