Hi snarek,
I should have been more clear in my post. I did not intend to imply that AOPA agreed with all the points - just the one I could see re: ADSB, and in that you've identified a reserved agreement.
My point was that there can be agreement on some issues.
I also wanted to stimulate discussion about specific issues. Thanks for replying - your response to most of the points have communicated AOPAs views clearly.
I am curious to see what you think about point 4:
Frequency boundaries to be included in maps to ensure correct ATS frequencies are known.
Because this will be in NAS 2B and it seems to me to be less safe with a greater possibility of aircraft being on an incorrect area frequency than there is now. Some might argue that boundaries clutter the maps, but aren't they essential information?
For the record I am an ATC, and I work with G, E, C, and A airspace.