Originally Posted by
liider
Because UK wants to get rid of European Court of Justice jurisdiction, and then it would be impossible to be a part of EASA.
Not true - other non-EU states are already in EASA without
direct ECJ jurisdiction, and the UK has already said it is OK with
indirect ECJ jurisdiction in cases like EASA.
Yes it is arguably a fudge of the UK "red line", but in reality almost every similar international agreement has some form of supranational tribunal of some sort.