Originally Posted by
nonsense
Because it wasn't an American movie, guns aren't the answer to every problem, once he left the car he was no longer a significant threat, killing him wasn't necessary in order to capture him, and he hadn't been tried, found guilty, and sentenced to death yet.
Seriously the mindset that if a gun might be used to solve a problem then any less deadly solution is redundant is very American; it permeates your movies and it drives your attitude to gun control and it is very different to the rest of the world.
My movies? My attitude to
gun control?
Nonsense, nonsense!
You're too keen to bring your personal agenda to the table.
Firstly, I'm not an American. Secondly, it was a tongue in cheek comment.
Thirdly, I never mentioned the use of guns.
He could have been stopped whilst in the vehicle, by aiming another at it.