Originally Posted by
KenV
Hmmm. An enemy that nukes a carrier battle group "with no collateral" has no military assets anywhere that could be nuked "with no collateral"? And once a nuclear exchange begins that is pure military "with no collateral" (yah shur), it will in no wise escalate? Yah shur.
Ken, it
might escalate but the whole point of selecting a purely military target is to reduce the certainty of escalation.