Originally Posted by
pezetaroi
What I mean is that the DGAC entirely blames the event on the weather, letting know that whoever was on the controls, the outcome would have been the same, clearly minimizing the fact, that the observer acting as a PF and then PM could have been the cause of the accident.
D'accord, but...
To understand the policy of blaming mainly on Wx (putting under the carpet the crew affaire), have to dig into the insurance contracts. Not reachable for us, but easy to suppose its terms.
Besides it, it's not to forget some peculiarities that could concur. All depends on the possible godfather/s of the crew members (inside & outside the carrier).
Can't say more...