Lead Ballon,
i have no intention of getting into a pointless semantics debate with you. I would only point out the following two salient facts from my post that you appear to have misinterpreted..
Firstly I acknowledged that, despite never giving it much thought before, I agreed with LeadSled’s position on the AIP having no head of power
Secondly I stated that my position was that I would not like to defend starts with the premise that “as the AIP has no head of power”
if you want to believe that is me saying I do believe the AIP has a legal head of power, then I can’t help you any further.
i don’t intend to get in a slanging match, which this place devolves to far too often, so i’ll leave it at that.