Originally Posted by
Chugalug2
I don't think I've misread it, and the picture it paints is of a dysfunctional system that reports some of the occurrences some of the time. That may fill your inbox, but it doesn't serve the needs of Air Safety.
I think it would be fairer to say the system at DHFS was dysfunctional due to DASORs being introduced part way through a contract in addition to the contractor's existing reporting system. That's not true of most of the system, and I see far more platform's DASORs than I need to because I'm nosy, so I'd disagree that ASIMS doesn't serve the needs of Air Safety.
Of course DHFS had the problem that the contractor was responsible for a far greater proportion of the activity than in more front line operations, the MFTS contract should have had the requirement nailed in from the start.