Originally Posted by
GlosMikeP
No it isn't. Read M R B Dunsmore's section in the IEE document and all will be revealed. No need to get absorbed in the hard sums; the implications stand out pretty well.
I'd imagine there's every need to become 'absorbed in the hard sums' to back up any guff on Carlo Kopp's site - particularly guff which cites thirty year old studies / papers not widely disseminated elsewhere.