[QUOTE=The Ancient Geek;10193854]The SACAA can be relied upon to publish a full investigation is due course, their work is always to a very high standard.
/QUOTE]
Paperwork seems to be a legitimate concern.
CRM is another issue, as is NOT running the EFTO/Fire Checklists amongst others.
A GoPro video is a pretty good substitute for the lack of CVFDR in this incident.
What is the alternative theory here?
That SACAA has it "in" for the crew due to a regulatory issue?
Seems like an unbiased and fact-based PRELIMINARY report IMO.
It appears some here don't like the facts as presented by SACAA?
Last edited by climber314; 15th Aug 2018 at 16:53.