Originally Posted by
Brercrow
Wizofoz thinks that wind is the same as no wind because all inertial frames of reference (IFR) are equally valid and he can measure a velocity relative to any IFR
Discuss
then:
Originally Posted by
Brercrow
It may be established physics.
It is not practical meteorology
Your responses are getting less and less rational as time goes on. This *is* physics, the idea that it has anything more than a passing connection to meteorology is just absurd. If we were discussing a boat in the river would you insist it was hydrology, not physics?