Originally Posted by
Starbear
But you already downloaded your copy. Correct? It’s gold. And as I said elsewhere the CP pronouncement on this was nothing short of asinine etc etc.
I do not remember the exact wording of the statement made.
If its intent was to bridle, intimidate, or imply retribution toward the legitimate use of sick leave guaranteed in COS, CA, or CBA, and was applicable to other jurisdictions (like the US for example), I believe it would unquestionably violate the laws in those jurisdictions. I think it might be prudent if a 'clarification' were issued which would indicate the Company fully supports the legitimate use of sick leave which in some cases is a contractural right.