0'n'1, an interesting viewpoint.
I wonder if this accident reflects a breakdown in thinking - as per “A chronic worry in HROs (High Reliability Organisation) is that analytic error is embedded in ongoing activities and that unexpected failure modes and limitations of foresight may amplify those analytic errors.”
http://drillscience.com/DPS/Organizi...eliability.pdf
Have the lessons in this line of thought been learnt? Possibly by Airbus, but have other areas of the industry heeded this view.
In extreme, regulators’ continuing belief that safety can be achieved with more regulation, or operators content that ‘it’ couldn’t happen to them, depending on how regulations are interpreted and applied, and exactly what ‘it’ is, which should be avoided.