PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 26th Jun 2018, 10:42
  #5104 (permalink)  
Not_a_boffin
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 530
Received 174 Likes on 93 Posts
Can only echo Engines' fine post and add that the CVSG(R), CV(R) and CV(F) requirement definition work was all aircraft-agnostic, in that it was not centred around STOVL JSF (or SSF, CALF or other predecessors). While the advantages of the JSF programme in terms of exploiting UK STOVL were acknowledged and it was assumed up until the late 90s that STOVL = smaller, cheaper ship, CTOL and STOBAR options (and variants thereof) were treated as equally valid.
Not_a_boffin is offline