Originally Posted by
Robert-Ryan
The antagonists over at STA have finally gotten their hands on the original 2003 sale agreement, I haven't read their full post but the jist seems to be that it doesn't teach them anything they didn't already know and true to their style they're exaggerating the negativity of it
I agree - not much we didn't know. I've always been a bit baffled about the "valuable land" argument. Much of it will be contaminated and it will have a cost to turn into something useful, and before you do that you need to get change of use and planning permission.