PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Good arguments for modifying procedures from operating manual
Old 31st May 2018, 08:40
  #22 (permalink)  
Meikleour
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 777
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LeadSled: A bit harsh on Megan!

The BA 747 "fly-on on 3" was certainly conducted well within the BA SOPs - HOWEVER - the fuel balancing procedure derived by BA never envisaged the situation where using the Override/Jettison Pumps for fuel balancing would not work once the tank fuel levels got down to the Standpipe levels! The crew then showed a stunning level of ignorance of the fuel system and failed to fuel balance correctly ( like on any other aircraft) thereby allowing the aircraft to land, off diversion, with very, very low fuel quantity in one of the tanks. BA has "history" with regard to modifying it's own SOPs away from the manufactures. (personel experience here )
With regard to the QF1 incident - had the captain been checking another crew who did what he did , then I suspect his debrief would have been most robust! As an aside the captain had, only a short time before, been delivering a talk to CX about CRM procedures at QF!!!! That incident should be a classic example of "things that should not be done in an aircraft".

Last edited by Meikleour; 31st May 2018 at 08:40. Reason: spelling
Meikleour is offline