Originally Posted by
Traffic_Is_Er_Was
And this story comes to light a year after it happened now?? Someone has an agenda.
I read both articles when this thread first started. QF obviously has the agenda, as they "broke" the story to Aus Av. Seems pretty p*ss poor of AA that they published while waiting for CBRs comments, then the very next day adjusted the story using CBRs comments, rather than write one meaningful article using both. But I guess that is journalism in this country now. I agree the truth probably lays somewhere between, but the damage has been done to CBR, as the QF version will be the one that people remember and discuss. QF
PR get their result.