PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - KL809 diversion/Li Battery thermal runaway
Old 13th May 2018, 22:57
  #14 (permalink)  
tdracer
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,420
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by FlightDetent
So, in one corner of the ring, we have approval for ETOPS 180 or even more on the aircraft (just my assumption for KLM 777)
and in the opposite a diversion because of a single passenger's phone thermal runaway.
Why do you think ETOPS is relevant? If you have an uncontrolled cabin fire and you're 180 minutes from an airport, I don't think having more than two engines is going to make much difference...
tdracer is online now