PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - 787 and lightning strikes
View Single Post
Old 2nd May 2018 | 01:02
  #21 (permalink)  
EEngr
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 780
Likes: 89
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by tdracer
Hence if they'd used aluminum they would have needed so much more to get the same conductivity that I doubt it would have saved any weight as copper is much more conductive (i.e. lower resistance) than aluminum. I believe titanium is even worse than aluminum.
Aluminum isn't too much worse than copper as far as conductivity goes. Copper has about 2/3 the resistivity of aluminum (the inverse of conductivity). And it is frequently used for larger electrical conductors due to weight advantages offsetting the larger conductor size needed (just not in home branch circuits). An aluminum aircraft skin will do just fine to attenuate lightning strikes. Titanium, on the other hand, is a pretty poor conductor (about 25x the resistivity of copper). What it will do is withstand higher temperatures. But the maximum temperature tolerable when dissipating a lightning strike is limited by the composite structure the mesh is embedded in.
EEngr is offline  
Reply