Originally Posted by
Australopithecus
Which is why QF should do their own fit-out in their own leased space. Zero risk for the airport owner.
In this particular case, there was already zero risk. They had the capacity and infrastructure already. QF just did not want to use it. So it has cost QF shareholders and WA tax payers between them 40 million(?) to duplicate existing facilities. Whilst you can't "unbuild" terminals, you want to maximise the utilization and return on what you do have, just as airlines do with their aircraft. PA understandably do not want to see that eroded any further.