PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Surely LNAV+V must be safer?
View Single Post
Old 22nd Apr 2018, 23:46
  #60 (permalink)  
Lead Balloon
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,296
Received 425 Likes on 212 Posts
Of course they shouldn’t have been in that situation in the first place and yes they were ‘lucky’. But there is the ‘luck’ of a coin toss and there’s the ‘luck’ of lotto numbers. Why did you choose “more than likely” as the probabilities of a crash rather than arrival?

A VFR stuck on top is stuck on top. A plan to arrive at an aerodrome that looks like it’s surrounded by very flat terrain, using all available technology, seems better than waiting for fuel exhaustion, trimming for best glide and hoping.

(Alpha has noted a technical difference - thanks.)
Lead Balloon is offline