Originally Posted by
A Squared
Perhaps I wasn't clear. Yes I agree that a single engine airplane can be safely operated using nenomics and flows. No, I don't think that the FAA would agree that will fill the requirement for "completing a checklist". Perhaps CASA has a broader view on that. Like I said, I don't know about that. If a CASA inspector would that sufficient on a checkride, I've no issue.
All the ones I've seen do. I've always assumed that it was a required element of a POH.
“Required element”, or just something that is generally there?
Are you saying that a C172/Baron etc that does not have a written checklist on board is now grounded?
I would love to see that somewhere in writing!
I can say that I completed CPL and MECIR (well, it’s ancestor anyway) tests without written checklists, however that was a long time ago.
