Without giving out free information....Leadsled, you would be wrong in your assumption on inaccuracies.
Regulation written with the blood of victims has no meaning in your world, I would guess.
By Dick's find...well done, sir. You are learning. However, the author appears to be a vested interest pushing one side of an argument. Why would you have two different cfit rates and, by extension, costs. All the fatalities are in small rpt or ga. No argument is made for a general benefit...then again, outside of aviation what use is a barometric correction, so why cloud your thesis with contradictions?
Since the MTSAT was available over our skies...according to Dick's author and to "plagiarise" his calculations for another purpose...we have cost our economy over $44,000,000 in approach cfit deaths...considering the authour says some $216,000,000 to set up a SBAS and run it...20% of the cost in deaths that would have been needless...blood of victims! Enough emotion...pay up, you are running out of time! Or would you prefer your arguments in more than 14000 words?