PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Flawed advice from Transport Minister McCormack’s office regarding SBAS
Old 18th Apr 2018, 02:45
  #22 (permalink)  
kimberleyEx
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North W.A.
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dick

With reference to the statement below:


"I find this quite mysterious. Would you consider the Cirrus SR22 to be “FMS equipped”? I thought it had simple Garmin equipment and without doubt it provides Baro-VNAV.

Virtually all Garmin equipped aircraft from now on I understand will have Baro-VNAV – that is, including C172s, C182s and so forth.

So what are the facts here"?


Can you provide me with the literature where it states Garmin equipment (excluding G1000 avionics) is Baro VNAV capable?

From what I understood most Garmin TSO-C146 receivers are LNAV/VNAV capable with SBAS (WAAS) coverage. Without, its LNAV+V (VNAV advisory) where the approach is flown to LNAV minimums.

With reference most TSO-C146 receivers out there in Aus GA or Regional turboprop, would it be safe to suggest most of those are not Baro VNAV capable? Only LPV or LNAV/VNAV with SBAS (WAAS) coverage.
kimberleyEx is offline