PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Latest information on CASA giant 40nm 5,000 foot CTAFs
Old 17th Apr 2018, 07:31
  #258 (permalink)  
andrewr
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
I do what AIP ENR 1.1 38-39 says.
I do not hear VFRs in E unilaterally contacting Centre to establish 2 way communications just for the sake of it.
I do not hear Centre trying to contact all unverified returns in E to estalish 2 way communications just for the sake of it.
So I guess that Centre and lots of VFR pilots like me do not take the same view as you do about what “Continous 2 way” means so far as VFR aircraft in E airspace are concerned.
Yes, I know that is what everyone does. What I am wondering is what the rules actually say.

What is your interpretation of "two way communication" as required for classes A, C, D, E and IFR in G? Is it different to monitoring, or "VHF radio
required" as for for class G above 5000?

I think it's an error, but Australian aviation has a few too many examples of the rules saying one thing but everyone knowing to ignore them and do something different.

And when people start quoting them at you...
andrewr is offline