PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Latest information on CASA giant 40nm 5,000 foot CTAFs
Old 17th Apr 2018, 01:03
  #245 (permalink)  
Lead Balloon
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,305
Received 426 Likes on 213 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewr
So do we ignore the table in ENR 1.4, or assume since it is possible to monitor and have 2 way communication we need to do both?
I do what AIP ENR 1.1 38-39 says.

I do not hear VFRs in E unilaterally contacting Centre to establish 2 way communications just for the sake of it.

I do not hear Centre trying to contact all unverified returns in E to estalish 2 way communications just for the sake of it.

So I guess that Centre and lots of VFR pilots like me do not take the same view as you do about what “Continous 2 way” means so far as VFR aircraft in E airspace are concerned.
Lead Balloon is offline